Objektibotasun zientifikoaren esanahi orokorraren auzia

Iñaki Requejo Aramendi

doi:10.26876/uztaro.131.2024.5077

Egileak

Iñaki Requejo Aramendi UPV/EHU

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26876/uztaro.131.2024.5077

Gako-hitzak:

Objektibotasun zientifikoa, Balioetatik aske dagoen ideala, Arrisku epistemikoa, Balio ez-epistemiko legitimoak

Laburpena

Lan honen helburua da objektibotasun zientifikoaren esanahia osatzeko lehen pausoak aurkeztea eta eztabaidatzea. Horretarako, lehenik, objektibotasun kontzeptuaren nahasmenaren zergatiak deskribatuko ditut, hala nola definizio klasikoen gainbeheraz, edo berori definitzeko orduan testuinguruak eta aldaketa historikoek duten garrantziaz arituko naiz. Bigarrenik, objektibotasuna definitzeko bide posibleak aurkeztuko ditut. Bertan, objektibotasuna ulertzeko eren areagotzeaz eta horiek esanahi bakar batean biltzeko aukerez jardungo dut. Hirugarrenik, kontzeptuaren izaera edo natura iheskor eta berezia argitara ekarriko da. Azkenik, esanahi orokor bat osatzeko lehen saiakera aurkeztuko dut modu laburrean.

Deskargak

Deskargen datuak oraindik ez daude eskuragarri.

Erreferentziak

Anderson, Elizabeth (2004). Uses of Values Judgements in Science: A General Argument, with Lessons from Case Study of Feminist Research on Divorce. Hypatia, 19, 1-24.

Arrieta Urtizberea, Agustin (2017). Zientziaren argi-itzalak. Udako Euskal Unibertsitatea.

Axtell, Guy (2016). Objectivity. Polity.

Biddle, Justin, eta Kukla, Quill (2017). The Geography of Epistemic Risk. Exploring Inductive Risk: Case Studies of Values in Science. Oxford University, 215-38.

Brown, Matthew J. (2019). Is Science Really Value Free and Objective? From Objectivity to Scientific Integrity. In K. McKain eta K. Kampouaris (argtz.), What is Scientific Knowledge? An introduction to Contemporary Epistemology of Science. Routledge.

Burch, Matthew, eta Furman, Katherine (2019). Objectivity in science and law: a shared rescue strategy. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 64, 60-70.

Cartwright, Nancy; Hardie, Jeremy; Montuschi, Eleonora; Soleiman, Maththew, eta Thresher, Ann C. (2022). The Tangle of science: Reliability Beyond Method, Rigor, and Objectivity. Oxford University Press.

Crasnow, Sharon (2021). Coherence objectivity and measurement: the example of democracy. Synthese, 199, 1.207-29.

Daston, Lorraine (1992). Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective. Social Studies of Science, 22, 597-618.

Daston, Lorraine, eta Galison. Peter (2007). Objectivity. Zone Books.

Diéguez, Antonio: (2024). La Ciencia en Cuestión. Herder.

Dorato, M. (2004). Epistemic and non-epistemic values in science. Science, values, and objectivity, 52-77.

Douglas, Heather (2004). The Irreducible Complexity of Objectivity. Synthese, 138, 3, 453-73.

Douglas, Heather (2000). Inductive Risk and Values in Science. Public Affairs Quarterly, 22, 120-39.

Douglas, Heather (2007). Rejecting the Ideal of Value-Free Science. In H. Kincaid, J. Dupre eta A. Wylie (argtz.), Value-free science? Ideals and illusions (120-39. or.). Oxford University Press.

Douglas, Heather (2009). Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press.

Elliot, Kevin. C. (2022). Values in Science. Cambridge Elements.

Fine, Arthur (1998). The Viewpoint of No-One in Particular. Proceedings and Addresses of the APA, 72, 9-20.

Gaukroger, Stephen (2012). Objectivity. Oxford University Press.

Hacking, Ian (2015). Let’s Not Talk About Objectivity. In Objectivity in Science. Springer, 19-33.

Harvard, Stephanie, eta Winsberg, Eric (2021). The Epistemic Risk in representation. Kennedy Institute of Ethical Journey, 32, 1-31.

Harding, Sandra. G. (1995). Strong Objectivity: A Response to the New Objectivity Question. Synthese, 104(3), 331-49.

Holman, Bennet, eta Wilholt, Torsten (2023). The new demarcation problem. Studies in History and Philosophy.

Intemann, Kristen (2015). Distinguishing between Legitimate and Illegitimate Values, in Climate Modeling. European Journal of Philosophy of Science, 5, 217-32.

John, Stephen (2021). Objectivity in Science. Cambridge University Printing House.

Janack, Marianne (2002). Dilemmas of Objectivity. Social Epistemology, 16(3), 267-81.

Kitcher, Philip (2001). Science, truth, and Democracy. Oxford University Press.

Koskinen, Inkeri (2018). Defending a risk account of scientific objectivity. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

Koskinen, Inkeri (2021). Objectivity in context: withholding epistemic judgement as a strategy for mitigating collective bias. Synthese 199, 211-225.

Koskinen, Inkeri (2023). Participation and objectivity. Philosophy of Science, 90(2), 413-432.

Kourany, Janet (2010). Philosophy of Science after Feminism. Oxford University Press.

Lloyd, Elisabeth A. (1995). Objectivity and the Double Standard for Feminist Epistemologies. Synthese 104(3), 351-81.

Longino, Helen E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.

Longino, Helen E. (2002). The fate of knowledge. Princeton University Press.

Ludwigen, David (2016). Ontological Choices and the Value-Free Ideal. Erkenntnis, 81, 1253-72.

Megill, Alan (1994). Introduction: four senses of objectivity. In A. Megill (argtz.), Rethinking objectivity (1-20. or.). Duke University Press.

Montuschi, Eleonora (2021). Finding a context for objectivity. Synthese, 199, 4.061-76.

Nagel, Thomas (1986). The View from Nowhere. Oxford University Press.

Neurath, Otto ([1921] 1973). Anti-Spengler. In M. Neurath eta R.S. Cohen (argtz.), Empiricism and Sociology (158-213. or.).

Porter, Theodore (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton University Press.

Proctor, Robert (1991). Value-free science? Purity and power in modern knowledge. Harvard University Press.

Reiss, Julian, eta Sprenger, Jan (2020). Scientific Objectivity. In Edward N. Zalta (argtz.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Staley, Kent (2017). Decisions, Decisions: Inductive Risk and the Higgs Boson. In K.C. Elliot eta T. Richards (argtz.), Exploring Inductive Risk: Case Studies of Values of Science (77, 14-34. or.).

Williams, Bernard (1986). Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Fontana.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1999 [1953]). Investigaciones Filosóficas. Ediciones Altaya.