DBHko Natur Zientziak, Teknologia eta Matematika espezialitateetako irakasleen pertzepzioa STEM ereduarekiko

Patricia Aránzazu Gonzalez Atutxa; Irati Romero Garmendia; Unai Carmona Igartua

doi:10.26876/uztaro.5104

Egileak

Patricia Aránzazu Gonzalez Atutxa Mondragon Unibertsitateko Humanitate eta Hezkuntza Zientziak
Irati Romero Garmendia Humanitate eta Hezkuntza Zientziak (HUHEZI) MU
Unai Carmona Igartua Humanitate eta Hezkuntza Zientziak (HUHEZI) MU

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26876/uztaro.5104

Gako-hitzak:

STEM, Irakasleen pertzepzioa, Derrigorrezko Bigarren Hezkuntza

Laburpena

Azterlan hone xede nagusia da Derrigorrezko Bigarren Hezkuntza etapako irakasleek STEM hezkuntza-ereduarekiko duten pertzepzioa aztertzea, irakaskuntza-ikaskuntza prozesuen ezarpenean eragina duelako. Alegia, irakasleak STEM ereduaren ezarpenaren eragile nagusiak izanik, gauzatuko dituzten praktikak marko horren inguruan duten pertzepzioaren araberakoak izango dira. Helburu hori betetzeko asmoz, Gipuzkoako sare guztietako 5 ikastetxetako Natur Zientziak, Teknologia eta Matematika ezagutza-arloetako 12 irakasle sakonki elkarrizketatu dira, aldez aurretik diseinatutako gidoi bat erabiliz. Emaitzen arabera, elkarrizketatutako irakasleek STEM hezkuntza-ereduaren antzeko ikuskera dute, eta, batez ere, STEM proiektuak diseinatu, ezarri eta ebaluatzeko denbora, baliabideak eta kalitatezko prestakuntza behar direla adierazi dute, aldez aurreko ikerketa ugarik ondorioztatu bezala.

Deskargak

Deskargen datuak oraindik ez daude eskuragarri.

Erreferentziak

ALLEA (All European Academies, 2023). Código Europeo de Conducta para la Integridad en la Investigación. Edición Revisada. https://allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/The-European-Code-of-Conduct-2023-ES.pdf

ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH. (2023). ATLAS.ti (versión 9.0) [Datu kualitatiboak aztertzeko softwarea]. https://atlasti.com

Appleton, K. (2003). How do beginning primary school teachers cope with science? Toward an understanding of science teaching practice. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 33, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023666618800

Aslam, F., Adefila, A., eta Bagiya, Y. (2018). STEM outreach activities: an approach to teachers’ professional development. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44(1), 58-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2018.1422618

Azman, A.A., eta Maat, S.M. (2019). A Systematic Review of Teacher’s Perceptions and Challenges towards STEM Integrations. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v8-i4/6814

Balka, K. (2011). Open source product development: the meaning and relevance of openness. Springer Science & Business Media.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.

Bell, D. (2016). The reality of STEM education, design and technology teachers’ perceptions: A phenomenographic study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(1), 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9300-9

Bell, D., Morrison-Love, D., Wooff, D., eta McLain, M. (2018). STEM education in the twentyfirst century: learning at work—an exploration of design and technology teacher perceptions and practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(3), 721-737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9414-3

Bisquerra, R. (koord.) (2016). Metodología de la investigación educativa. Editorial La Muralla, SA.

Blazar, D., eta Kraft, M.A. (2017). Teacher and teaching effects on students’ attitudes and behaviors. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(1), 146-170. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716670260

Brand, B.R. (2020). Integrating science and engineering practices: outcomes from a collaborative professional development. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00210-x

Brown, R., Brown, J., Reardon, K., eta Merrill, C. (2011). Understanding STEM: Current perceptions. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(6), 5-9.

Bybee, R. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35.

Çevik, M., eta Bakioğlu, B. (2022). The Effect of STEM Education Integrated into Teaching- Learning Approaches (SEITLA) on Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis Study. International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(2), 119-135. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2022.431.8

Dopo, F.B., eta Ismaniati, C. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions of digital natives, digital learning resources and motivation to utilize digital learning resources. Journal of Educational Technology Innovation, 3(1), 13-24.

Du, W., Liu, D., Johnson, C., Sondergeld, T., Bolshakova, V.L.J., eta Moore, T.J. (2019). The impact of integrated STEM professional development on teacher quality. School Science and Mathematics, 119(2), 105-114. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12318

EL-Deghaidy, H., Mansour, N., Alzaghibi, M., eta Alhammad, K. (2017). Context of STEM Integration in Schools: Views from In-service Science Teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2.459-2.484. https://doi.org/10.12973/EURASIA.2017.01235A

Elhuyar (2024). Aditu: Elhuyarren hizketa-ezagutzailea. Aditu Elhuyar. https://aditu.eus

Ha, C.T., Thao, T.T.P., Trung, N.T., Huong, L.T.T., Dinh, N. Van, eta Trung, T. (2020). A Bibliometric Review of Research on STEM Education in ASEAN: Science Mapping the Literature in Scopus Database, 2000 to 2019. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(10), em1889. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8500

Hallström, J., Norström, P., eta Schönborn, K.J. (2023). Authentic STEM education through modelling: an international Delphi study. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00453-4

Han, S., Yalvac, B., Capraro, M.M., eta Capraro, R.M. (2015). In-service teachers’ implementation and understanding of STEM project based learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1306a

Herro, D., eta Quigley, C. (2017). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of STEAM teaching through professional development: implications for teacher educators. Professional Development in Education, 43(3), 416-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1205507

Honey, M., Pearson, G., eta Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press.

Hsu, Y.S., Tang, K.Y., & Lin, T.C. (2023). Trends and Hot Topics of STEM and STEM Education: a Co-word Analysis of Literature Published in 2011–2020. Science and Education, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00419-6

Hymes, D. (2006). ¿Qué es la etnografía? In Á. Díaz de Rada, H.M. Velasco eta F.J. García (argtz.), Lecturas de antropología para educadores (175-192. or.). Trotta.

Johari, S., Hasniza, I., eta Mahani, M. (2013). Implementation of problem based learning in higher education institutions and its impact on students’ learning. In M.-Y. Khairiyah, A. Mahyuddin, B. Mohamad, E. Graaff, A. Kolmos eta P. Fatin, PBL Across Learning (eds) Paper presented at Fourth International Research Symposium on PBL (66-73 or.). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Aalborg University Press.

Kelley, T.R., eta Knowles, J.G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z

Klassen, R.M., eta Chiu, M.M. (2010). Effects on Teachers’ Self-Efficacy and Job Satisfaction: Teacher Gender, Years of Experience, and Job Stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 741-756. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019237

Lee, V.E., Dedrick, R.F., eta Smith, J.B. (1991). The Effect of the Social Organization of Schools on Teachers’ Efficacy and Satisfaction. Sociology of Education, 64(3), 190-208. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112851

Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., eta Froyd, J.E. (2020). Research and trends in STEM education: a systematic review of journal publications. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6

Lupión-Cobos, T., Girón-Gambero, J., eta García-Ruiz, C. (2022). Building STEM inquirybased teaching proposal through collaborations between schools and research centres: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 899-915. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.2.899

Margot, K.C. eta Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2

Martín-Páez, T., Aguilera, D., Perales-Palacios, F.J., eta Vílchez-González, J.M. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? A review of the literature. Science Education, 103(4), 799-822. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21522

Mayer, R.E. (2004). Should There Be a Three-Strikes Rule Against Pure Discovery Learning?: The Case for Guided Methods of Instruction. The American Psychologist, 59(1), 1.419. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14

Meyer, O., Imhof, M., Coyle, D., eta Banerjee, M. (2018b). Positive learning and pluriliteracies. Growth in higher education and implications for course design, assessment and research. In O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O. Wittun eta A. Dengel (argtz.), Positive

Learning in the Age of Information (235-265. or.). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi: 10.1007/978-3-658-19567-0_15

Miles, M.B., eta Huberman, A.M. (1994) Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2. ed.). Sage.

Moore, T.J., Stohlmann, M.S., Wang, H.H., Tank, K.M., Glancy, A.W., eta Roehrig, G.H. (2014). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In Engineering in pre-college settings: Synthesizing research, policy, and practices (35-60. or.). Purdue University Press. ProtoView. Ringgold, Inc.

Nadelson, L.S., eta Seifert, A.L. (2017). Integrated STEM defined: Contexts, challenges, and the future. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(3), 221-223. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00220671.2017.1289775

Pfeffer, J., eta Sutton, R.I. (2000). The knowing-doing gap. Harvard Business School Press.

Pujolàs, P. (2008). Ideas clave. El aprendizaje cooperativo. GRAÓ.

Rahman, N.A., Rosli, R., Rambely, A.S., Siregar, N.C., Capraro, M.M., eta Capraro, R. M. (2022). Secondary school teachers’ perceptions of STEM pedagogical content knowledge. Journal on Mathematics Education, 13(1), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.22342/org/10.22342/jme.v13i1.pp119-134

Robbins, S.P. (2003). Organisational behaviour (10. ed.). Prentice Hall.

Sari, F.A., eta Juandi, D. (2022). Analysis of Senior High School Mathematics Teachers’Perception of The Application of STEM-Based Learning. Kreano : Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 13(2), 296-307. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v13i2.36522

Sarobe, A., Carmona, U., Lopez, N., Azkue, I., Astigarraga, E., García, I., Iribas, H., eta González, P.A. (2020). Zertarako behar dugu STEM hezkuntza? Hik Hasi, 249, 36-38. ISSN 1135-4690

Sellami, A., Ammar, M., eta Ahmad, Z. (2022). Exploring Teachers’ Perceptions of the Barriers to Teaching STEM in High Schools in Qatar. Sustainability, 14(15.192). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215192

Shernoff, D.J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D.M., eta Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0068-1

Siew, N.M., Amir, N., eta Chong, C.L. (2015). The Perceptions of pre-service and in-service teachers regarding a project-based STEM approach to teaching science.

SpringerPlus, 4(1), 1-20. https://doi:10.1186/2193-1801-4-8

Spradley, J.P. (1980). Participant Observation. Rinehart & Winston.

Stake, R.E. (2013). Multiple Case Study Analysis. Guilford Press.

Straw, S., Macleod, S., eta Hart, R. (2012). Evaluation of the Wellcome Trust Camden STEM initiative. NFER, Slough.

Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. Falmer.

Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., eta Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM Education: A Systematic Review of Instructional Practices in Secondary Education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/85525

Thibaut, L., Knipprath, H., Dehaene, W., eta Depaepe, F. (2018). How school context and personal factors relate to teachers’ attitudes toward teaching integrated STEM. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(3), 631-651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9416-1

To Khuyen, N.T., van Bien, N., Lin, P.L., Lin, J., eta Chang, C.Y. (2020). Measuring teachers’ perceptions to sustain STEM education development. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041531

Wahono, B., eta Chang, C.Y. (2019). Assessing Teacher’s Attitude, Knowledge, and Application (AKA) on STEM: An Effort to Foster the Sustainable Development of STEM Education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040950

Wang, H.-H., Moore, T.J., Roehrig, G.H., eta Park, M.S. (2011). STEM Integration: Teacher Perceptions and Practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314636

Wang, M.-T., eta Holcombe, R. (2010). Adolescents’ Perceptions of School Environment, Engagement, and Academic Achievement in Middle School. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 633-662. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209361209

Weber, E., Fox, S., Levings, S.B., eta Bouwma-Gearhart, J. (2013). Teachers’ conceptualizations of integrated STEM. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 17(3), 1-9.