Non-culprit lesion revascularization in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease
PDF (Euskara)

Supplementary Files

Taula: IRA-PCI, S-PCI edo/eta MV-PCI estrategiak alderatzen dituzten entsegu klinikoak, partaideen parte-hartze zein baztertze baldintzak, definizioak eta oinarrizko ezaugarriak. (Euskara)

Keywords

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
multivessel disease
non-infarct related artery
percutaneous coronary intervention

How to Cite

Mora Ayestarán, N., Zubia Olaskoaga, F., & Roy Añón, I. (2020). Non-culprit lesion revascularization in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease. Osagaiz: Osasun-Zientzien Aldizkaria, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.26876/osagaiz.1.2020.292

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the culprit lesion is now considered the gold standard in the treatment for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) is found in approximately 40-65% of patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. The optimal reperfusion strategy and timing of revascularization (MV-PCI, S-PCI or IRA-PCI) in hemodynamically stable patients with STEMI and multivessel disease remains uncertain. Recent studies suggest that complete revascularization is superior to culprit-only revascularization in this context. In this review, we summarize the available evidence on treatment options for patients with STEMI and MVD.

https://doi.org/10.26876/osagaiz.1.2020.292
PDF (Euskara)